Skip to main contentThe Local Bench

Category ranking · 7 models · checked 2026-10-13

Tool use and agents

Ranked by BFCL V4, overall accuracy. Source: Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard data_overall.csv.

  1. Qwen3 4B Instruct 250735.7
  2. ToolACE-2 8B42.4
  3. xLAM-2 8B46.7
BFCL V4, overall accuracy. Longer is better. Values are exactly as published; the table below links each one.

BFCL V4, overall accuracy

3 with a published score, 4 not yet measured.

#
Model
Parameters
Score
Source
Licence
1xLAM-2 8B
Salesforce
8.0 B46.68%SourcedSource
xLAM-2-8b-fc-r (FC) row, rank 34.
CC-BY-NC-4.0
Check terms before commercial use
2ToolACE-2 8B
Team ACE
8.0 B42.44%SourcedSource
ToolACE-2-8B (FC) row, rank 40.
Apache-2.0
3Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507
Alibaba Qwen
4.0 B35.68%SourcedSource
Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 (FC) row, rank 54.
Apache-2.0
—Arch-Function 3B
Katanemo
3.1 BNot yet measured—Katanemo Research
Check terms before commercial use
—GLM-4.5 Air
Z.ai
110.5 BNot yet measuredNot listed in BFCL V4.MIT
—Hermes 3 8B
Nous Research
8.0 BNot yet measured—Llama 3 Community
—watt-tool 8B
Watt AI
8.0 BNot yet measured—Apache-2.0

How to read this: one public benchmark per category, so you can compare like with like. We copy the published number and link it; we do not re-run it, average different benchmarks or fill gaps. Vendor-reported numbers use each vendor's own settings, so treat small gaps as ties. “Not yet measured” means we found no comparable public score, not that the model is weak.

Every model was checked against the Hugging Face API on 2026-10-13: it exists, is public, and has the parameter count and licence shown. Other categories: Math and reasoning · Coding · Vision-language · OCR and documents · Speech to text · Text to speech · Image generation · Embeddings and rerankers · Small fast 'System 1' · Biomedical · Multilingual and translation · Time series · Robotics (VLA).

Machine-readable: /api/v1/categories/tool-use-agents.json